Scorptrio wrote: A common misconception is that some qualities automatically preclude others. Such as, if a man is sensitive and a "nice guy" then he can't also have the qualities of the warrior archetype (protector, defender, champion etc.) or the qualities of the "bad boy" as well. The point is, wouldn't the "complete package" by definition have both those seemingly disparate qualities but only manifest them at the right time? Just a thought.
i have read this several times and i still can't figure out what you are trying to say.
we all know the 'nice guy' can't be the 'bad boy'. so if it is a misconception that they can; then why are you pointing out that the complete package has both qualities, showing them at different times?
i don't understand you're point.
the complete package= the perfect man
the perfect man= figment of the imagination
no guy is perfect, as is no woman. yet, we still wait/ wish/ hope/ dream that one day this prince, that we dreamed up as a little girl (along with the perfect wedding dress, perfect names for their kids, and perfect home) after watching too many disney movies, will show up.
not going to happen.
so, you have to lower the standards and go with whats more important. can't find tall, dark, and handsome even though thats whats you've always wanted, gonna have to settle for tall and handsome.
blabla, this is all redundant and i am rambling. everyone already knows this shit. so i'm going to stop typing.
oh wait, while i'm on the subject i would like to interject that i've yet to meet a "nice guy" thats worth a shit in bed.
is that a misconception as well?