I think its appropriate to say that punk is dead....just like any music related social movement or trend goes away....disco is dead, new wave is dead, grunge is dead...

That doesn't mean you can't still listen to it or like it or make a band who could be described as it.

Noise, I do not think will be the next big subcultural movement.

All I know is that I hate bands like blink 182, good charlotte, etc, etc, that pop punk shit that insults the entire past of punk music. I hate it when abercrombie girls come into HT and ask for "raymons" shirts (ramones).

All I know is that I love some punk music, the ramones, bad brains, sonic youth, misfits, and lots of music influenced by punk (like say bauhaus or early siouxsie). Siouxsie was a freakin' sex pistols groupie. Its not wrong (I don't think) to say that the modern goth thing evolved out of punk in the late 70s (and yes, of course goth literature, music and architecture has been around for centuries). However, I hate sloppy fucking music, which the majority of this new punk is to me. I also notice that I dislike the majority of people who say they are punk, because most of them are simply low iq junkies and if you don't give them a dollar or agree with them, they say, "oh well, fuck you I could beat you up." So few of these punks are politically aware at all and I think that is the only way punk could really survive in any form somewhat true to its roots- by having a message against the system, the man, whatever. The evolution of music is fascinating to study, how politics affects it, how one thing influences one thing influences another.

I used to know this guy who was all "punk as fuck" 24/7 who would diss the music I listened to, then once he picked up a book and read about how punk was influenced by other stuff he started having respect for stuff I liked.

GG Allin in my opinion hasn't been terribly influential, even though he may have influenced certain individuals, he was basically the first shock rocker, Marilyn Mansons precursor.

I don't think there is anything wrong with kids these days liking punk music, but it is kind of weird when they totally spout off about it. I like bauhaus but am not gonna act like I was at the core of the whole early goth thing and can preach the word on goth. So, its odd for me to hear people younger than me or even my age (even though I met Joey Ramone years ago) act like they are experts, because, sorry, you aren't. I listen to a lot of punk because MY MOM did and because my ex husband got me into it.

One thing I don't get at all is why "punks" have to be rude? At the cramps show I noticed a friend of mine repeatedly flipping off Lux and saying "fuck you" yet he bought a cramps shirt and when I asked him about it, it was apparently "punk". Thats just kind of retarded to me...but...oookay...lol.

My 9 year olds favorite bands are Queen and Agent Orange, hehe...

Interesting thread..funny too...

Buttercup wrote:I think its appropriate to say that punk is dead....just like any music related social movement or trend goes away....disco is dead, new wave is dead, grunge is dead...

Nooooo, don't tell me that grundge is dead. I'm still in denial!!!

kurt cobain is still alive.

who thinks the cramps are punk?

Something being "dead" is just a reference to how popular it currently is among the "mainstream alt." crowd. Honestly, who cares? I'll listen to whatever it is if I like it regardless of how "dead" it may be. It seems as antiestablishment as the punk movement is, it would be apathetic as to whether some consider it "dead" or not. Now I'm not a huge punk fan, mostly due to the fact that I haven't been exposed to a lot of it as of yet.. but I plan to keep on listening to the likes of The Misfits, Me First and Gimme Gimmies and The Ramones.

JealousofRegis wrote:who thinks the cramps are punk?

Not anyone I know of, however there were plenty of people who would call themselves punk at their show.I was asking the guy about his behavior, and apparently being rude is "punk".

Buttercup wrote:

JealousofRegis wrote:who thinks the cramps are punk?

Not anyone I know of, however there were plenty of people who would call themselves punk at their show.I was asking the guy about his behavior, and apparently being rude is "punk".

I think being rude is just plain old being rude. No manners, man.

JealousofRegis wrote:who thinks the cramps are punk?

I think the cramps suck.

But then, so does bowel cancer.

1. Alice Cooper was the original shock rocker.
2. The Cramps are somewhere beetween punk and _____abilly. But more towards a ______billy band. Some of their stuff is very rockabilly...some of their stuff is hellabilly....some of their stuff is slightly punkish...but i sway more toward the _____abilly side than i do the punk side....the same arguement could basically nearly be made with the stray cats....sorta punk but much more rockabilly.

Noise, I do not think will be the next big subcultural movement.

you're wrong becuase it allready is/was

what do you think will be the "next subcultural movement"?


ps
i love you
we should talk about bright eyes more

but anyway back to anti-everything

answer my question

happy christmas buttercup
love
travix

rec|use wrote:

Noise, I do not think will be the next big subcultural movement.

you're wrong becuase it allready is/was

what do you think will be the "next subcultural movement"?


ps
i love you
we should talk about bright eyes more

but anyway back to anti-everything

answer my question

happy christmas buttercup
love
travix

I guess I missed Noise as the next/newest thing..*shrug*
I have been wrong before...lol.

It seems to me that "hardcore" music, whether its hardcore or screamo (scream+emo for those of you who have no idea what I'm talking about) is picking up momentum. I see a lot of the youth these days into stuff like that.

Aww..happy holidays to you too, and as for Bright Eyes, I've heard great things about the next album but refuse to steal it off the internet...

I guess I missed Noise as the next/newest thing

that's weird
everyone is going apeshit over wolfeyes now cuz they are on subpop


they were supposed to do lollapalooza i think with sonic youth at one point
but that all got canned

and i just saw that suicide girls (of all places) did an interview with them

so i'd say via them
noise is catching on in a lot of places i never thoght it would
allthough this is all just a big media trend
and all the hype will be gone by spring i'm sure

then it'll be back to the msg boards and 3" cd's limited to 25 copies
etc
etc
etc

Tonight on Kill Your Television
12am on Channel 12 Comcast
Channel 10 Knology
Channel 6 Charter

THE SLEEPYTIME GORRILA MUSEUM

The following description brought to you from a mind of limited knowledge:

A strange concoction of sounds reminiscent of Einsturzenden Neubtaun (up yours spellsmiths!), the Melvins and Bjork.

They have a very unique stage show and are garbed in some type of gothic-post-plague European dress.

Deciede and Judge for yourselves!

ah, I must've misread the cramps thing

that one dude was right though
being rude is just being rude
or being a dick
somethin

JealousofRegis wrote:ah, I must've misread the cramps thing

that one dude was right though
being rude is just being rude
or being a dick
somethin

I'm a dudette, but thanks.

Buttercup wrote:

JealousofRegis wrote:who thinks the cramps are punk?

Not anyone I know of, however there were plenty of people who would call themselves punk at their show.I was asking the guy about his behavior, and apparently being rude is "punk".

huh? what?
the cramps have always said they were a punk band
we didnt have the nice little labels when that band started we have today, and they called themselves punk....
and i agree. they are.

my bad
I knew you are
but I didn't look at who wrote that

I don't know man, the cramps are ok and all
but I wouldn't call em punk
they're that rockabilly shit

well, what a bit of reading to do... lol... and, no, i had nothing better to do since ibbie's been installing his christmas present... so, here goes...
"the who" are a very good illustration of why punk will never die... primarily for one reason- punk isn't a form of music (although expression of punk has been) it is an attitude and a way to deal with life.. i won't piss anyone off more by listing bands that exhibit the charasteristics of the punk attitude now-a-days, but suffice it to say, they aren't the ones that call themselves punk.. i do so get nostalgic when seeing people like ben and junkie who in different ways exhibit those qualities i hold so dear... and joe, who's a big goof and reminds me of my own "punk days"... however, i don't think i've lost what punk is all about... you could say that i've "conformed", but, frankly, i'd say fuck you! and get on with my life ... you guys can think whatever you want and believe you know what punk is, but those who live it have no question... this thread, however, has been quite entertaining for some of us older people... no, i don't think age has anything to do with it... do i dare digress... oh, sure, why not... only a few of you will "get it" any way... one word, "warrior"... please, continue the discussion

Bone wrote:If you want to get to the some real early roots of influence on punk- look at The Who.

A-fucking-men.

When I was sixteen, I remember sitting down and listening to their music, and saying to myself, "Well fuck me. There is somebody else out there who 'knows what its like to be hated. to be jaded.'"

I'd have to say they were one of the most influential bands I've heard in my life.

I can't say that I "am punk". But I can whole-heartedly respect, and understand punk, because it makes sense.

On that note, while I could hardly call punk "dead", mainstream is eating punk alive - and has been, for over a decade. And because every person thinks differently, even in the slightest, each person's idea of punk has been diluted through that same person's subjective filter. After so many twists and turns through the corporate mechanism's wallet, what most people consider to be "punk" is really rather tame.

C'mon, most people couldn't bring themselves to imagine beating the shit out of someone, even if they do own the Special Collectors Edition Two Disc Set of Fight Club. Sure they might say, "yeah, that'd be nice." but fucking hell, could they really put themselves in that position, even for a second? No. They might call their fucking lawyer and see if they can sue the fucker, but would they consider picking up that slugger and denting a skull or two?

Nah. That's barbaric.

I'm not saying punk is about being violent. Not at all. Nor am I saying that my own, diluted ideal of punk is what's supposed to be "correct".

Fuck "correct".

I'm saying that, to me, being "punk" is about allowing yourself to lay back, and enjoy the show. And if you can't sit back, allowing yourself to get pissed off about it. And beyond that, actually fucking doing something about it.

So yeah, what I'm saying, in a nutshell, is that "punk music" is not necessarily "punk".

It's expressing yourself.

So if you want to be punk, rant about how you want to beat the shit out of the Maytag man for fucking up your dishwasher after you've turned his forehead into a big, pink golfball.

Not before. After. Cause and effect. "Shit!" *Wham!* *Thud!* "Mofo!"

Thus, in conclusion: The Who owns you. Accept the fact that the rabid space monkey clan shall rule the world some day. And don't eat all the funions.
</rant>

edit: i hate people (ibbie's not a person, he's a monkey, so it's all good)