To correct you all. His avatar is not a 'gun.' The avatar is the one of the greatest, if not the greatest, assult riffle in the world. So wonderful that one can hide it in thier blazer. It is a finely crafted weapon...not a 'gun.'
To correct you, dear...The MP7 is a SMG (Sub-Machine Gun), not an assault rifle...
miz kitty wrote:Wow! Everyone on the board has been hard at work while I've been busy getting laid. May I suggest that all of you go out and have sex for about 36 hours, then come back and see how truly ridiculous all of this seems.
Believe it or not...Some of us don't revolve around sex...I'll go write now.....
(Note: I said 'some', not 'most')
Thats probably why you have a gun for an avatar, Lighten up a bit.
Lighten up? You do realize that it was meant as a joke....Right?...Maybe you should take your own advice...I was making fun at my own expence...
karmakaze wrote:whats wrong with having a gun for an avatar?
*shrugs*Nothing's wrong with having a gun in your avatar...I would say that it's wrong for you to have a gun...lol...
To correct you all. His avatar is not a 'gun.' The avatar is the one of the greatest, if not the greatest, assult riffle in the world. So wonderful that one can hide it in thier blazer. It is a finely crafted weapon...not a 'gun.'
As for Ben...no guns...and definetly no finely cafted weapons
B_Ko wrote:Are we talking about vampire killing guns or regular guns?
That depends on the definition of 'Vampire' we're using...
The ones I'm talking about can terminate just about anything...The MP7 can penitrate 1mm of Titanium & 20 layers of kevlar at 200 meters...& it's full-auto...
Alur- I prefer the MP7 due to utilitarian purposes...The P90 is a rocking firearm, but I would have to say that HK just makes better weapons...If I where to argue with any of this, I would have gone with the Russian PP2000...It's a bad as little gun for a 9x19mm....& VERY functional...
I have here pictoral evidence that the P90 is a far more utilitarion weapon than the MP7.
That right there is Richard "The" Dean Anderson. MacGyver. Brigadier General Jack O'Neil. He would only use the most broadly useful gun, he would settle for no less. I rest my case.
That's it?...That's you basis of evidence?...Richard Dean Anderson...I think you just forfited you case...Seriously...lol...
All joking aside...I'm really not trying to argue any of this...I think that there are alot of firearms that are superior...That most people would argue with me on...Like...Fuck Glocks...They suck...Not for the reasons that people argue against them...Not for their reliability...That they are...Not for anything I can throw against them other than, & could never use one...I would feel uncomfortable with them...Therefore, IMO, they suck, as far as I'm concerned...Give me a HK .45 USP Match...& we're in business!
Oh I'm just being silly. I know very little about fire arms. I wathced a documentary on Discovery or some such about the P90 once is all. And the only reason I did that is because I'm a Stargate SG-1 junkie, and I wanted to learn more about the guns they use for geeking purposes.