Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 7:16 am
by JaNell
jane doe wrote:i totally have to agree on this one. male dancers are gross! i hate tans, and big muscles, and veins, and large chins (which they all seem to have). its waaaaaayyyyyy to cheesy for me. i like em little. a little bit of tone and a pinch of muscle, and a touch of soft and squishy....mmmmm, thats just right. and if they have nice, soft pale skin. oooops, wet the pants-thats what happens. which i always found. . . i dont know. . . annoying since im so big. i always feel like im the guy in the relationship and they are the girl (atleast when we are lying in bed, or dancing, or just about anything else where physical size would come into play). oh well, it works.
I also have a thing for little guys - lightly muscled, greenish eyes, full lips, and
shorter than me.
RAWR.
TheSym is a bit tall for me, but RAWR nonetheless.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 9:17 am
by celticsmith
Way back in early prehistory. Boy Caveman and Girl Caveman were sitting on the rock futon in the place where the coffee house would be built in about 10,000 years. They were waiting for coffee to be invented so they could order some and discussing philosophy.
Philosophy being a nouveau artform, and thus not fully developed. The conversation was not too terribly deep.
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Nargo varl uhgh? (Supposing I were to give you this lovely squirel that I just killed. Perhaps then you might enticed to relent?)
Girl: Yuh! (Well, alright. Just this once, but only because you are such a handsome, intelligent, charming and gifted man.)
Boy: Uh! (Well now! Isn't that just a wonderous thing to behold.)
Boy: Ungha? (Can I touch it?)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Thus, began an long standing relationship. Where upon males discovered that females were wonderous creations to behold....and that they could be had for a price.......at least temporarilly.
....and female learned that males were dumb enough to pay for anything they wanted....so long as they couldn't have it.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 9:31 am
by JaNell
celticsmith wrote:Way back in early prehistory. Boy Caveman and Girl Caveman were sitting on the rock futon in the place where the coffee house would be built in about 10,000 years. They were waiting for coffee to be invented so they could order some and discussing philosophy.
Philosophy being a nouveau artform, and thus not fully developed. The conversation was not too terribly deep.
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Nargo varl uhgh? (Supposing I were to give you this lovely squirel that I just killed. Perhaps then you might enticed to relent?)
Girl: Yuh! (Well, alright. Just this once, but only because you are such a handsome, intelligent, charming and gifted man.)
Boy: Uh! (Well now! Isn't that just a wonderous thing to behold.)
Boy: Ungha? (Can I touch it?)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Thus, began an long standing relationship. Where upon males discovered that females were wonderous creations to behold....and that they could be had for a price.......at least temporarilly.
....and female learned that males were dumb enough to pay for anything they wanted....so long as they couldn't have it.
Oooookkkkaaaaaayyyyy.
Right.
Sorry for those of you still grunting...
Sorry that men have such self-esteem issues, and think that they have nothing pretty to look at, or touch.
Sorry I've apparently been doing the exchange thing wrong all these years, when I could have had cash instead of relationships...
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 11:42 am
by Celestial Dung
So let me get this straight. Women will let me see things only if I give them a dead squirel?
*blinking*
Well what I learned out of that history lesson is that women are weird.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:00 pm
by Caustic
Celestial Dung wrote:Well what I learned out of that history lesson is that women are weird.
And today, you are a man, my son.
Re: male vs female nakedness
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:06 pm
by mafiaman
ophelia wrote:Squishy?
Oh, come on! You're in college, extrapolate the reference from available data.
Re: male vs female nakedness
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:10 pm
by mafiaman
EvilVegan wrote:Squishy (skwsh-ee)
adj. squish·i·er, squish·i·est
Soft and wet; spongy.
Sloppily sentimental.
I was going to say something witty, but its almost 5am and the definition I got from dictionary.com was way better than the stuff I was trying to say. Nice visuals. . .
Thank you EvilVegan, you are most definitely a labor saving device if I ever met one.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:21 pm
by mafiaman
celticsmith wrote:Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Uhgh! (Me want see it!)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Boy: Nargo varl uhgh? (Supposing I were to give you this lovely squirel that I just killed. Perhaps then you might enticed to relent?)
Girl: Yuh! (Well, alright. Just this once, but only because you are such a handsome, intelligent, charming and gifted man.)
Boy: Uh! (Well now! Isn't that just a wonderous thing to behold.)
Boy: Ungha? (Can I touch it?)
Girl: Nuh! (No.)
Have you been time travelling without a liscence again? I thought yours was revoked after that incident with Napoleon and Josephene? (I hear it had something to do with a sheep....)
And why do the cave people seem to be talking in Klingon?
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:36 pm
by Celestial Dung
We're decended from Klingons?
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:44 pm
by faeriegirl
you guys crack me up.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 1:42 pm
by iblis
Celestial Dung wrote:So let me get this straight. Women will let me see things only if I give them a dead squirel?
it's sick and twisted, but yeah. bullwinkle would have long ago lost his virginity, if only he'd kill his best pal.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 2:02 pm
by Celestial Dung
hmmm....I refuse to be a part of such a barbaric practice. Courtship baaah just another reason to hurt innocent cute things.
Re: male vs female nakedness
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 3:06 pm
by ophelia
mafiaman wrote:ophelia wrote:Squishy?
Oh, come on! You're in college, extrapolate the reference from available data.
I understand the definition of the word. I didn't understand the reference, or I found it amusing.
Don't use my college education against me.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 6:20 pm
by celticsmith
One must observe the lessons of history...
Squirrels are just rats with fancy tails anyway.
I fully encourage anyone (male or female....let us not be sexist cause da bitches hate that) that is historically inclined to go out and kill 6 to 12 squirrels. Put them in a sack and go down to the strip club of your choise. I promise that if you go up and offer the dancer a fist full of bloody squirrels in the middle of her dance routine that the reaction you will get would be best described as......
......Quite Primal.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 6:23 pm
by pryjmaty
celticsmith wrote:One must observe the lessons of history...
Squirrels are just rats with fancy tails anyway.
I fully encourage anyone (male or female....let us not be sexist cause da bitches hate that) that is historically inclined to go out and kill 6 to 12 squirrels. Put them in a sack and go down to the strip club of your choise. I promise that if you go up and offer the dancer a fist full of bloody squirrels in the middle of her dance routine that the reaction you will get would be best described as......
......Quite Primal.
LMAO
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 6:34 pm
by Bone
*sniff sniff* am I begining to smell the dumpster?
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 6:53 pm
by pryjmaty
That's called dead squirrel, dear.
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2003 9:16 pm
by The Stormstress
Hmmmm.... all the way from apology 2 dead squirrels... What a strange world!