Mercurygriffin wrote:So you can rationalize not really caring about this because they want to have fun, (because they are afraid according to your pattern) which they had to pay for. If you happen to be in a club in the coming years that gets raided by the national gaurd or any other armed force and you get tackled to the ground, beaten and choked with tear gas, just remember that you almost deserve it because you (presumably afraid) payed for it.

I don't recall ever saying I didn't care that this happened. Of course it would suck to be in a field, on Ecstasy, and suddenly have cops show up with AK-47s.

Jack wrote:I don't recall ever saying I didn't care that this happened. Of course it would suck to be in a field, on Ecstasy, and suddenly have cops show up with AK-47s.

Seriously, get your facts straight :p

Cops would use M16's or M4's. AK's are for law breakers and third world armies.

creapyrob wrote:Seriously, get your facts straight :p

Cops would use M16's or M4's. AK's are for law breakers and third world armies.

Yeah, I knew that thanks to Counter Strike. And they say violent video games aren't educational...

Read "Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster" by David Icke...some people think he is a nut but he brings up some very valid points. Bush is just a puppet for what is really going on. I got one word for ya, and it starts with an "I".

And that's all I have to say on that...

Jack wrote:

Mercurygriffin wrote:So you can rationalize not really caring about this because they want to have fun, (because they are afraid according to your pattern) which they had to pay for. If you happen to be in a club in the coming years that gets raided by the national gaurd or any other armed force and you get tackled to the ground, beaten and choked with tear gas, just remember that you almost deserve it because you (presumably afraid) payed for it.

I don't recall ever saying I didn't care that this happened. Of course it would suck to be in a field, on Ecstasy, and suddenly have cops show up with AK-47s.

You never said you didn't care but by all responces you only wish to blame this on the choices of the victims and not the fact that the people behind this have control issues. Instead of rationalizing why it was their own fault, why not put blame sqaurly on the shoulders of the ones who want to rule over others because they are afraid that someone else might be right. Consumers may buy things as a distraction but politicans make laws and take freedoms because they are afraid of being uncomfortabe. Which is worse? and jack was right about the gun thing. They were at least simi-auto assualt weapons.

As far as the Big I goes, I think there might be a possibility but not to the level that most people put on it.

I'm sorry if it came across that I was blaming the consumer; that wasn't my intent.

As far as the "big I" goes, that's just another front. Things are both vastly more simple and unimaginably more complex than most "conspiracy enthusiasts" imagine.

Example: ever wonder how Alex Jones could POSSIBLY have sneaked into Bohemian Grove - unless he was allowed to? The security at that place should be tighter than anywhere in the world - if he could sneak in with a camera, which he did, what would stop someone from sneaking in with a sniper rifle?

http://www.infowars.com

Jack wrote:If we didn't live in a state of paranoia, fear, and general unhappiness we would buy less things. Fact.

Sure. If you already have a supercomputer capable of 900 gigaflops, then why the hell would you bother buying another one?

Answer: You're unhappy with how things are being run, so you decide to try to take over the world!

man i need some gigaflops