Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in
waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht
the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but
the wrod as a wlohe.
Fcuknig amzanig huh?

Bone wrote:Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in
waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht
the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but
the wrod as a wlohe.
Fcuknig amzanig huh?

Wee lesti vah ut gti uth erti treluts ne reath, toh!
Ewe steil hav tu git thu rite letturs en thear, tho!
You still have to get the right letters in there, though!

Nemesis wrote::rofl:

Bone wrote:Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in
waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht
the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but
the wrod as a wlohe.
Fcuknig amzanig huh?

most people i know (self included) spell that bad anyway.....

That's why it's so hard to read "n e" for "any" or "u" for "you" - the brain has to switch tracks and actually sound out the letters rather than keep reading the code, which, like DNA, doesn't have to be in the right order to work if it has the right parts.

All of this might also explain a lot about dyslexia.

junkie christ wrote:

Bone wrote:Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in
waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht
the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but
the wrod as a wlohe.
Fcuknig amzanig huh?

most people i know (self included) spell that bad anyway.....

JaNell wrote:That's why it's so hard to read "n e" for "any" or "u" for "you" - the brain has to switch tracks and actually sound out the letters rather than keep reading the code, which, like DNA, doesn't have to be in the right order to work if it has the right parts.

All of this might also explain a lot about dyslexia.

I read it just fine....are you sure YOU are ok?

nazi.....lol

scarecrow wrote:

JaNell wrote:That's why it's so hard to read "n e" for "any" or "u" for "you" - the brain has to switch tracks and actually sound out the letters rather than keep reading the code, which, like DNA, doesn't have to be in the right order to work if it has the right parts.

All of this might also explain a lot about dyslexia.

I read it just fine....are you sure YOU are ok?

nazi.....lol

Heil Webster!!!

::Draws Country accent::
What the hell's all at spose to meen? Wees simple fok out in hear. Was that there latin?

scarecrow wrote:

JaNell wrote:That's why it's so hard to read "n e" for "any" or "u" for "you" - the brain has to switch tracks and actually sound out the letters rather than keep reading the code, which, like DNA, doesn't have to be in the right order to work if it has the right parts.

All of this might also explain a lot about dyslexia.

I read it just fine....are you sure YOU are ok?

nazi.....lol

I'm great. You're trying to start a fight again, though. Give it a rest, Spanky.

Codeine Coma wrote:::Draws Country accent::
What the hell's all at spose to meen? Wees simple fok out in hear. Was that there latin?

Nemesis wrote:Heil Webster!!!

I'm sort of a High Church OED person, myself.

you know, bone, i read that somewhere myself. i found it quite interesting.

littlepockit wrote:you know, bone, i read that somewhere myself. i found it quite interesting.

My Sister sent me that in an E-mail. I thought some of you might enjoy it too.

i got that in a email about 3 weeks ago...

well arent you just special???

J/King

but yeah, thats is rather interesting.

U'd likely b surprized what n e human mind can comprehend when properly opened, trained, & attuned...

JaNell wrote:

scarecrow wrote:

JaNell wrote:That's why it's so hard to read "n e" for "any" or "u" for "you" - the brain has to switch tracks and actually sound out the letters rather than keep reading the code, which, like DNA, doesn't have to be in the right order to work if it has the right parts.

All of this might also explain a lot about dyslexia.

I read it just fine....are you sure YOU are ok?

nazi.....lol

I'm great. You're trying to start a fight again, though. Give it a rest, Spanky.

Soundz 2 me like sum1 else iz lookin' 4 a "spanky"... 2 bad ur NOT my typ!

I read about this on September 15th, via /.'s article, Can You Raed Tihs?

It's pretty cool, and IMNSHO, rather accurate; especially regarding digraphs. Of course, it doesn't work quite so well when you start breaking up complex phonemes (e.g.: ordered, interdependent phonemes such as "eau", and "ough". Argh!) , diphthongs, and the like.

Oh well.

Oh, and I love the hell out of this text scrmabling perl script.