Ya or nay? Is it a good thing or a bad thing? Do you think it makes a difference while indulging in the act of fornication?

being of the c lot and never being asked about it i'd say hwo cares?!
but from what i've read women like a u.c. unit better and if you don't have one at birth, shit man just keep it clean!!!

would you cut off a leg?

I personally am clipped and i like it because it just looks better than those i've seen with skin hanging off of them but a female friend of mine has something to add, who I swear is a Nympho, Libby's loving daughter viXey " the added skin does make the guy more senstive, letting them shoot faster, but at the same time makes it harder to keep touching the extra sentice area bringing that extra little bit of fun . Also it is harder to keep clean, which is one reason unless you say na, Baby men are chopped. Sometimes the guy after shooting the extra skin will pull back and its painfully exsposed, stuck and the guy painfully has to fix it. I would rather have a clipped guy, but if its huge I wont turn it down ^^"

See straight from a expert

I personaly would think its gross seeing all that extra skin

I am cut. But a lot of people seem to think it's a Bad Thing™. Research it, and decide for yourself.

There are some pretty graphic pictures at those sites, by the by. Definitely not work safe.

i wish i would not have been cut so the jaw would drop a few more inches when it gets exposed........
but for health reasons im glad its cut.

i'm against cutting for the most part, unless a male is old enough to make the decision for himself for Religious reasons or odd kinks, or it is one of the very small minority of cases where it actually is medically necessary. Why cause pain to your infant when there is no reason to? Even if it's your religious beleifs, it's YOUR religious beliefs, not the child's. All the guys that i have been with that have been un-cut have had no probs with keeping it clean or anything else. My personal opinion is if a guy isn't smart enough to keep his dick clean then he just needs for it to get infected and get gangrene and fall off anyway so he won't contribute to the gene pool. Darwin in action.

Plus fore-skin just gives ya all the more to play with!

Sorry, but I think I would totally freak if a guy was uncut. I just think its gross...I mean schmegma...EWWWW!! Dickcheese! Yech!

And I certainly wouldn't be putting it in my mouth either!


I had to make the decision for my brat to be cut, because they say its best for the kid to look like their dads, and he was circumsized. Of course, I didn't watch them do it. Yeah, I think its probably unneccessary, weird and archaic. But...we poke our kids full of vaccinations in infancy, and somehow his circumcision didn't seem to bother him enough to keep him awake at night...*shrug*

Buttercup wrote:Sorry, but I think I would totally freak if a guy was uncut. I just think its gross...I mean schmegma...EWWWW!! Dickcheese! Yech!

Actually all guys that i have been with that are un-cut are actually less gross than guys that i have seen that are circumcised. Something about it being more important for them to keep it clean so they do so. Guys with foreskin actually whipe themselves off when they pee!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I prefer cut.

never actually gotten my hands on one that was uncut. so i have no basis for comparison. but i cant imagine it would make much of a difference to me