Since most of you were not watching......

Sir Diddimus · Post by **Sir Diddimus** » Mon Feb 02, 2004 5:29 pm

http://www.drudgereport.com/mattjj.htm :iblislink:

I still think it was all part of the plan........ :fuckedup:

Lost Traveler · Post by **Lost Traveler** » Mon Feb 02, 2004 5:53 pm

love the metal thing, but she's always flashing her breast, still to this day trying to prove shes not michel in descise.

TheSym · Post by **TheSym** » Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:17 pm

The halftime extravaganza was the worst fetish show I've ever seen.

With the music they played...it would have been perfect...oh five years or so ago.

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:38 pm

this is a scam to get mtv in the news more and to promote her new album.

and im glad.. just because of the metal thing. i want one!!
janet went goth
jacko jerks juniors
latoya.... psyhic drug whore hotline
tito smokes crack

what a fucking family
i think janet needs to start doing hardcore fetish porn.
with me,

X · Post by X » Mon Feb 02, 2004 8:20 pm

Call her Janet....Ms Jackson if ya nasty

The Stormstress · Post by **The Stormstress** » Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:19 pm

(*)(/) ... oopz! :lol:

Mistress Eve(L) · Post by **Mistress Eve(L)** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:03 am

BWahahaha thats cute stormy........I actually watched it with about 30 friends and coworkers, and the whole room completely dropped their jaws at that. Yeah so what. it was planned....shit I would wanna show off a piercing like that too.
the cup was rip away.
and when Justin ripped it off, she didnt even flinch, she didnt try to cover herself........
HOWEVER......um there were kids in the crowd....that wasnt kosher

Memorable line of the night.
"Uh was that Janets boob?" :shock:

The Stormstress · Post by **The Stormstress** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:34 am

Thnx Eve(L)!

On the issue ov kidz c-ing it... I think that our ntire nation could uze a lil' loosening up on the nudity thing... every1 haz a bod... no big mf deal, imo... granted, I waz raized by nudist hippie typez & taught that the body iz a beautiful & natural thing not 2 b ashamed ov... Hell, n Europe, u can watch porn on daytime tv ... Damn what thoze Puritanz did 2 this country!!!

Coor · Post by **Coor** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:44 am

I think that they used to be a couple or something. Anyways, Janet has a shitload of piercings. She's always been goth.

ms.tangledwebs · Post by **ms.tangledwebs** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:45 am

The Stormstress wrote:Thnx Eve(L)!

On the issue ov kidz c-ing it... I think that our ntire nation could uze a lil' loosening up on the nudity thing... every1 haz a bod... no big mf deal, imo... granted, I waz raized by nudist hippie typez & taught that the body iz a beautiful & natural thing not 2 b ashamed ov... Hell, n Europe, u can watch porn on daytime tv ... Damn what thoze Puritanz did 2 this country!!!

I am afraid I have to disagree here, I am quite comfortable in my own skin, but I do not believe that means I should expose myself to other people's children. It is a parent's place to choose how their child is raised in this regard, and no one should force their views on others. If you want to raise your child to run around naked, that is your choice, but if I don't want my child around yours for that reason, that is my choice.

Coor · Post by **Coor** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:50 am

THIS IS MY 200th post! OK now to the important stuff...

I would rather have my childern watch two people making love than killing each other. But they allow that shit on daytime, and primetime all the damn time. Violence is acceptiable, but love is not?

*Yes I do know that someonbe else said that quote " I would rather have my children watch two people make love, and kill each other"

ms.tangledwebs · Post by **ms.tangledwebs** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:52 am

Coor wrote:THIS IS MY 200th post! OK now to the important stuff...

I would rather have my childern watch two people making love than killing each other. But they allow that shit on daytime, and primetime all the damn time. Violence is acceptiable, but love is not?

*Yes I do know that someonbe else said that quote " I would rather have my children watch two people make love, and kill each other"

agreed, if it were down to those two choices, I would choose the same, but I would not choose either of them if there was another option.

Coor · Post by **Coor** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 1:02 am

OK, Correction : THIS is my 200th post

Probably me too, but I wanted to get the point across between Eurpoe and America

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 1:03 am

id rather people stop breeding...
but thats just me.

ms.tangledwebs · Post by **ms.tangledwebs** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 1:08 am

junkie christ wrote:id rather people stop breeding...
but thats just me.

some of us were meant to breed and some of you weren't

The Stormstress · Post by **The Stormstress** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 1:09 am

ms.tangledwebs wrote:
The Stormstress wrote:Thnx Eve(L)!

On the issue ov kidz c-ing it... I think that our ntire nation could uze a lil' loosening up on the nudity thing... every1 haz a bod... no big mf deal, imo... granted, I waz raized by nudist hippie typez & taught that the body iz a beautiful & natural thing not 2 b ashamed ov... Hell, n Europe, u can watch porn on daytime tv ... Damn what thoze Puritanz did 2 this country!!!

I am afraid I have to disagree here, I am quite comfortable in my own skin, but I do not believe that means I should expose myself to other people's children. It is a parent's place to choose how their child is raised in this regard, and no one should force their views on others. If you want to raise your child to run around naked, that is your choice, but if I don't want my child around yours for that reason, that is my choice.

I would xpect that many peepz disagree with me... nothing new... most every1 n this country haz had this Puritanical bs shoved down their throatz from birth & certainly forced upon us... Not saying that children should run the streetz naked :roll:

... just saying that it'z not the end ov the world if they c a boob & if they were taught that the body iz beautiful & natural nstead ov dirty & shameful, they would not really b bothered, if even affected, by it.

Coor · Post by **Coor** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 1:20 am

OK, did anyone else notice that it skipped my 200th post! I think I've lost sight of the importance of this thread. :-?

The Stormstress · Post by **The Stormstress** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 1:25 am

junkie christ wrote:id rather people stop breeding...
but thats just me.

Truly! At least, there should b a screening process 2 qualify 2 breed... I c more proof ov that every day!

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 2:08 am

The Stormstress wrote:
junkie christ wrote:id rather people stop breeding...
but thats just me.

Truly! At least, there should b a screening process 2 qualify 2 breed... I c more proof ov that every day!

the stop breeding post was a joke (shannon you actually took that serious? i subscribe to your daughters blog for fucks sake!)

but the screening process thing...
ive been saying that people should have to pass a battery of tests to be legally allowed to breed for years and ill stand by it till the day i day.
really.
i actually have (outside my jokes about it) an outline on my computer of guidelines people should have to go thru.....
luckily 90% of the parents i know (now anyway.. dunno about say a year or two ago) would pass it... none of the people that read this board i know with kids would fail
but the point remains.

ms.tangledwebs · Post by **ms.tangledwebs** » Tue Feb 03, 2004 2:20 am

junkie christ wrote: (shannon you actually took that serious? i subscribe to your daughters blog for fucks sake!)

baby, my response to your post was a joke as well, you are welcome to breed if you would like. (tho I recommend things such as a steady girl etc, first, but that is up to you)

as for the rest of the thread, in my house we regularly run around naked, and seeing a breast is not a big deal, but I don't believe that one should be exposed in a situation where there is not warning for those who would be offended. There are people who would, I am sure, have taken their children away from the tv or out of the stadium for that time, if they had been given the option. But, from what I understand (correct me if I am wrong) this was not shown in rehearsal and someone just randomly thought it would be a good idea to, once again, "enlighten and expose" the general public to nudity (by again, I am refering to the madonna and britney episode of a few months ago).
I suppose this is the new version of shock jock, since nothing is really considered shockingly rude verbally, then we must be assaulted with blatant sexuality. The human body is a beautiful thing, but in this situation I don't believe it was being displayed as such.

on a side note, I totally want a pair of those nipple shields for when I am done baring children

Since most of you were not watching......

Since most of you were not watching......

Keep your CBS eye on the boob tube...