Super Sring Theory explained

Post by **Arkady** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 9:57 pm

For those of you that have been curious about the Grand Unification Theory or Super Sring Theory, there is a great 3 hour Nova series available to watch online at the following url:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html

The various chapters really makes the Theory of Relativity (how gravity works), Quantum Mechanics (particle laws), and String Theory easy to understand with great graphical models and analogies. Enjoy.

blindboy · Post by **blindboy** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:11 pm

i watched that when it came on pbs. cool stuff.

iblis · Post by **iblis** » Tue Dec 23, 2003 11:20 am

Wow, they covered a lot there with their videos.

But there's no mention of how quantum energy is developed by anal sex...

...junkie?

doctorthoss · Post by **doctorthoss** » Tue Dec 23, 2003 5:50 pm

Here's a really good site that's devoted just to this topic:
http://superstringtheory.com/

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Tue Dec 23, 2003 6:39 pm

iblis wrote:Wow, they covered a lot there with their videos.

But there's no mention of how quantum energy is developed by anal sex...

...junkie?

its being saved for after the theories are stomachable and the public can digest it........

Logic · Post by **Logic** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 5:16 am

Although these programs are really fucking pointless and a waste of time they are very interesting and entertaining in a we made all of this up a half hour ago kind of way.

iblis · Post by **iblis** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 10:16 am

Blargh.

People who can't understand the pleasure of learning simply to learn should be sterilized. :roll:

Logic · Post by **Logic** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 10:57 am

People who can't word their sentences good enough to prove their point should be taught how to word their sentences good enough to prove their point.

I cannot control what pleases me.

That's why if I hear of some black dude having casual sex with a willing 7 year old boy and his dog I have nothing to say.

razor · Post by **razor** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 11:31 am

Logic wrote:People who can't word their sentences good enough to prove their point should be taught how to word their sentences good enough to prove their point.

I SO agree.

Logic wrote:Ok. If the flu mutated and evolved since its birth as soon as you caught you'd be dead.

BearDragonLady · Post by **BearDragonLady** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 1:17 pm

funny...

Logic · Post by **Logic** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 1:19 pm

It's called a fucking typo.

Kilashayne · Post by **Kilashayne** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 6:07 pm

Logic wrote:People who can't word their sentences good enough to prove their point should be taught how to word their sentences good enough to prove their point.

Grammatically speaking, your statement should read "their sentences WELL enough." i'm sure it's just a typo.

Logic · Post by **Logic** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 6:25 pm

Nope. You're right.

Celestial Dung · Post by **Celestial Dung** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 6:52 pm

Actually Logic you raise an interesting point. How do you mean " we made all of this up a half hour ago kind of way" What do you think of the Super String theory and do you believe these theories will have any impact on human existence.

I won't be replying until tomorrow...Christmas you know gotta go home to family and eat tons and tons of Snow Cream

slurp...but anyway your thoughts are welcome.

And a suggestion. Let this be a no grammer strictness zone...Someone's intelligence will be determined by what they say not how they say it. We'll get along bettter promise.

Logic · Post by **Logic** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 7:10 pm

I will also be answering when I'm not just coming here every 15 minutes in between rice cakes.

iblis · Post by **iblis** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 7:10 pm

Logic wrote:People who can't word their sentences good enough to prove their point should be taught how to word their sentences good enough to prove their point.

I had a wonderful rant, but you know, you're just not worth it.

phpBB needs an "ignore user" checkbox. Hell, I'm certain about 80% of users would have "iblis" on their list.

Post by **darkvader** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 8:29 pm

iblis wrote:phpBB needs an "ignore user" checkbox. Hell, I'm certain about 80% of users would have "iblis" on their list.

It's coming in phpBB 2.2.

I'll likely be upgrading very quickly once it's stable.

now if only I could actually use the ignore user function... but no, I've got to read everybody.

FreakySeekers · Post by **FreakySeekers** » Wed Dec 24, 2003 8:49 pm

AAAAAAAAWWWWWWW Poooooor Vader ~runs over and gives HIM a BIG HUGGLE!!!!~

littleseeker