HPV Vaccination on the way

elasticwings · Post by **elasticwings** » Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:50 pm

HPV vaccination in works to hit market by Spring 2007. The vaccination creates an immunity to HPV 16, 18, 6, and 11. 6 and 11 are two type that are known to cause genital warts. All types are known to cause the majority of cases of cervical cancer.

Yay, now if only they can patch all the other STD's. Go Science!!!

http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20060406-10010100-bc-us-cervicalcancer.xml

elasticwings · Post by **elasticwings** » Fri Apr 07, 2006 7:34 am

And of course... the Bush administration is fighting it. Remember girls, Bush wants you to get cervical cancer and die...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/10/31/MNG2LFGJFT1.DTL

Francesca · Post by **Francesca** » Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:47 am

elasticwings wrote:And of course... the Bush administration is fighting it. Remember girls, Bush wants you to get cervical cancer and die...

Bush wants us to BREED, get cancer and die....

elasticwings · Post by **elasticwings** » Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:54 am

They're not trying to block it, they're just trying to block making it mandatory. Personally, I'm not sure whether or not I would agree with making it mandatory, but I don't like their reasoning as to why they don't want it to be mandatory. They believe that it will put a damper in their abstinence campaign. When it comes out, I will take it myself and if I had any kids, I would have them vaccinated too.

Hardcoregirl · Post by **Hardcoregirl** » Fri Apr 07, 2006 9:03 am

Hrm, well until they make a vaccine that prevents pregnancy and HIV I don't think they have to worry too much lol.

I don't personally like the idea of mandatory vaccines. They aren't the safest things all the time.

karmakaze · Post by **karmakaze** » Fri Apr 07, 2006 9:28 am

elasticwings wrote:They're not trying to block it, they're just trying to block making it mandatory. Personally, I'm not sure whether or not I would agree with making it mandatory, but I don't like their reasoning as to why they don't want it to be mandatory. They believe that it will put a damper in their abstinence campaign. When it comes out, I will take it myself and if I had any kids, I would have them vaccinated too.

i don't care for kids. and don't intend to have any. but its that kind of attitude of being in power and trying to force your personal morality down societyâ€™s throats makes me want to go out and knock somebody up.

sort of makes me wonder if the government has put a damper on the development of the AIDS/HIV vaccine. Because that is part of their primary argument for the whole abstinence thing.

Oh no! if they come out with vaccines for STDs then the American people can go fuck all the dirty whores they want!

tbones · Post by **tbones** » Fri Apr 07, 2006 11:59 am

elasticwings wrote:They're not trying to block it, they're just trying to block making it mandatory. Personally, I'm not sure whether or not I would agree with making it mandatory, but I don't like their reasoning as to why they don't want it to be mandatory. They believe that it will put a damper in their abstinence campaign. When it comes out, I will take it myself and if I had any kids, I would have them vaccinated too.

maybe they are making it mandatory because 50% of sexually active men and women are infected with the virus..

Coor · Post by **Coor** » Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:53 pm

I posted that shit like a year ago.

It most likely won't be mandatory...not for around 5 or 10 years after its been out...for safety reasons.

Dark Elf · Post by **Dark Elf** » Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:09 pm

I like what this woman said: "Just because you wear a seat belt doesn't mean you're seeking out an accident," Kaye said.

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:57 am

karmakaze wrote:sort of makes me wonder if the government has put a damper on the development of the AIDS/HIV vaccine. Because that is part of their primary argument for the whole abstinence thing.

funny you mention. theres alot of articles printed on that, mostly conspiracy but enough to make you seriously wonder. and if thats the case, i think that every person whos interrupted that research needs to be shot.

Oh no! if they come out with vaccines for STDs then the American people can go fuck all the dirty whores they want!

its reasons like that i abs-o-fucking-lutely love this man.

karmakaze · Post by **karmakaze** » Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:37 am

junkie christ wrote:
karmakaze wrote:sort of makes me wonder if the government has put a damper on the development of the AIDS/HIV vaccine. Because that is part of their primary argument for the whole abstinence thing.

funny you mention. theres alot of articles printed on that, mostly conspiracy but enough to make you seriously wonder. and if thats the case, i think that every person whos interrupted that research needs to be shot.
Oh no! if they come out with vaccines for STDs then the American people can go fuck all the dirty whores they want!
its reasons like that i abs-o-fucking-lutely love this man.

Yeah I have read some of the same articles. but even those articles aside, you really have to wonder, if they are taking such a strong stance against this vaccine for the reasons they are stating, you really have to wonder what their response would be if someone developed a vaccine for AIDS or Herpes.

As for mandatory vaccinations, as long as they have been rigorously tested, my only issue with them would be based on who had to pay for it.

Which I do not think a vaccine for AIDS should be very far off. They actually have several documented cases of people who have developed an immunity to the virus without the help of medical science. one case i remember was a hooker in asia who had been exposed to AIDS at least a few hundred times but never got HIV.

love you to JC

miz kitty · Post by **miz kitty** » Wed Apr 12, 2006 10:16 am

maybe they are making it mandatory because 50% of sexually active men and women are infected with the virus..

actually it's more like 65% to 70%....scary statistic. If the vaccine becomes available for adults, I will most definatley get it. As far as manditory...that's a whole other issue.

Hardcoregirl · Post by **Hardcoregirl** » Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:42 am

miz kitty wrote:maybe they are making it mandatory because 50% of sexually active men and women are infected with the virus..

actually it's more like 65% to 70%....scary statistic. If the vaccine becomes available for adults, I will most definatley get it. As far as manditory...that's a whole other issue.

Yep, according to the Centers for Disease Control-

Approximately 20 million people are currently infected with HPV. At least 50 percent of sexually active men and women acquire genital HPV infection at some point in their lives. By age 50, at least 80 percent of women will have acquired genital HPV infection. About 6.2 million Americans get a new genital HPV infection each year.

So, girls, when we are 50 we can safely start KnoxgothicHPV.com lol.

elasticwings · Post by **elasticwings** » Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:23 am

karmakaze wrote:Which I do not think a vaccine for AIDS should be very far off. They actually have several documented cases of people who have developed an immunity to the virus without the help of medical science. one case i remember was a hooker in asia who had been exposed to AIDS at least a few hundred times but never got HIV.

Apparently.... you think right.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/14/AR2006041401387.html

X · Post by X » Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:17 am

and by the time you are 50 9 out of 10 people will have contracted some form of hpv in said lifetime