Random Junkie Christ Thread

JaNell · Post by **JaNell** » Fri May 09, 2003 6:10 pm

1) Why do junkies say such amazingly profound things that are clearly relevant and understandable even while subvocalized through a mouth full of moldy green nubs?

2) Blue, or white?

3) And if that's true, why not?

4) How many times?

5) Did you enjoy it?

And finally,

6) Piglet as a metaphor for Peter Pan's Inner Child. Discuss.

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Fri May 09, 2003 7:09 pm

JaNell wrote:1) Why do junkies say such amazingly profound things that are clearly relevant and understandable even while subvocalized through a mouth full of moldy green nubs?
2) Blue, or white?
3) And if that's true, why not?
4) How many times?
5) Did you enjoy it?
And finally,
6) Piglet as a metaphor for Peter Pan's Inner Child. Discuss.

1) haha. because they are wasted and have nothing but time.... those who use the time constructively reading, writing, learning, can make the mind perform without the inhibitations of social expectation, bias, god, ect.
im between 4-5 months clean right now... i think alot clearer now that that mess is over. the green nubs come from lack of hygiene, which even when i junkie i obsessed over (ones like that are RARE). so i never had that problem.

2) blue to is nobility. white is purity.
im pure now in comparison to the ways ive lived and seen others live, i do ironicly enough see blue in most good people i meet anymore... you notice they are far from pure but accepted the sins of the past and are noble creatures for it......
you can never lose hope for all of humanity, just realize its pointless for generations to come.
but if your going for the drug question of blue or white, white wins every single time.EVERY time.

3)i think thats kinda answered above. most people stay impure and go thru cycles of purity (never last long, hell mines ending now..).

4) as many as it takes.

5)everything everytime.

6)both have been used for books of zen, there is a publication called the "Tao of Pooh" i believe was the name...... (i know its parallel to zen but its on the same pretense and im going to draw its example in Zen...) piglet does crossreference childhood SOMEWHERE in this book (ive read it like 5 freakin times.....). well if piglet is the zen like essence of childhood, you could say that peter pan, since he commands the lost boys (isnt that the name?) was the zen like instrument they required to function, he was the essence they seeked... pooh required piglets childish views to function at his "peak"..... pan required the lost boys....
so zen/peak functionality = instrument+inspiration so zen/peak functionality = instrument+inspiration.
z/pf=pooh+piglet z/pf=pan+lost boys...
or pooh is to piglet as pan is to lost boys.
soooooo now that the theoreticals have been established:
the inner child of peter pan was best represented by the brainless actions of the lost boys, poohs only suboridanate in the realm of stupidity was piglet. these are the neccessary failing elements one must keep to hold the balance of inner child to rational thought since the essence of an inner child is purity with failure. the lost boys/piglet failed often thru their quests of exploration (behavior psy. would refer this as experimental/instinctive learning, ives een its called both..).....
see the parallel?
piglet shows a required naievty of failure often assoicated to an inner child.
peter pan makes no mistakes because he has the lost boys to explore options of failure... they get into trouble he bails em out...
piglet is a comparison of the lost boys as pooh needs piglet.......
boy that is mispelled and badly strung but you see it....

i think a better comparison thats MUCH more doable is comparing the zen motions of piglet to a lost boy and pooh to peter pan....

Vampilot · Post by **Vampilot** » Fri May 09, 2003 8:44 pm

ow.

now my brain hurts. that's just too much piglet-info...

heh!

so, o-great-junkie-christ.... you know the unspoken theory... answer it in print... I gotta get my noggin around it...

why am i invisible?
why does lucifer only appear as an uber-hottie?
why are my sox inside-out?
and my personal fave:
what in the world does 'what-the-fuck' really mean?

V

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Fri May 09, 2003 8:59 pm

Vampilot wrote:so, o-great-junkie-christ.... you know the unspoken theory... answer it in print... I gotta get my noggin around it...
why am i invisible?
why does lucifer only appear as an uber-hottie?
why are my sox inside-out?
and my personal fave:
what in the world does 'what-the-fuck' really mean?
V

the unspoken theory applies to a select group of individuals and their disposition to the gravitational pull of unwanted objects that by nature of constitution have their own gravitonal pull.....
what is it that selects this group into the pull of this force of nature is something that i can never know, and until i have discovered the root of this evil this shall remain the afore mentioned "unspoken theory".......
2)your not invisible, you (as i) are in purgatory. east TN is the big catholic secret... but when we leave this endless waiting room we slowly fade back into the perception of those around us... given that your probably moving soon, id say your prayers are collecting nicely, now time to see if they gave up bottom of the ninth....
3)lucifer the uber hottie? "what the fuck" have you been reading? haha?
4)your sox...... because your from the west coast, and the polarity of you formly living on this coast makes you slowly shift to our polarity of the east coast, aka ASS BACKWARDS......
5)what-the-fuck, or as its sometimes read WTF, is an expression that was probably started by a virgin around the conception of the wonderful word fuck... given that he (obviously a male did this) did not understand this he probably exclaimed WHAT THE FUCK?
its just stuck. now its used a reference for something that we dont understand.....
point in case, when im researching the unspoken theory, or falling victim to it, i constantly find myself screaming WHAT THE FUCK!
or when i meet a women and always get the same told the same three ways to fuck off, i exclaim what-the-fuck.....

there you go and bottle of humperdity doo too.....!

starification · Post by **starification** » Fri May 09, 2003 9:05 pm

why the hell are SOME girls so dramatic? you know what i mean.
and why the heck do guys ACT and DO two completely different things?

<3

white_darkness · Post by **white_darkness** » Fri May 09, 2003 9:54 pm

Oy...this stuff is starting to raise the bar upwards in spots...I need inspiration!!!

*begins drinking steadily*

pryjmaty · Post by **pryjmaty** » Fri May 09, 2003 11:43 pm

junkie christ wrote: find some men with less baggage that dont like abuse.

But I WANT one that likes abuse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hardcoregirl · Post by **Hardcoregirl** » Fri May 09, 2003 11:43 pm

Pharinet wrote:BUT! why is it that when I leave you alone Mr Nemesis that you talk about butt sex?
What is this phenomonon that causes men, when left alone to talk amongst themselves that the converstion reverts to anal sex?

I think it is my influence.... :wink:

Oh yeah...get ready for knoxanal.cyb3rpunk.net....

muhahahaha!

pryjmaty · Post by **pryjmaty** » Sat May 10, 2003 12:00 am

Why do I receive such pleasure at the mere thought of inflicting pain on another person?

The Stormstress · Post by **The Stormstress** » Sat May 10, 2003 12:38 am

LadyIvanna wrote:Why do I receive such pleasure at the mere thought of inflicting pain on another person?

(In best "Church Lady" voice) "I don't know. Could it b SATAN?"
:twisted:

Imp · Post by **Imp** » Sat May 10, 2003 1:36 am

In societies with titles, the name is often placed in front of the title, separated by "the," such as "so and so, the Duke of York." This would lead you to assume that "Winnie the Pooh" is a name, Winnie, and a title, Pooh.

What kind of title is Pooh?

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Sat May 10, 2003 1:36 am

starification wrote::roll:

why the hell are SOME girls so dramatic? you know what i mean.
and why the heck do guys ACT and DO two completely different things?

<3

a)
its not just girls, its guys too. alot of people with no life make one up. and they get ******gasp******** dramatic. its bull shit. see thru em for what they are.
b)
again women do this too. the answer is they are so average they dream of being anything but. they are so boring they dream of being anything but. this isnt all of the world, just the fakes. jess, you just keep meeting the WRONG fucking people.
real lives are made.
period.

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Sat May 10, 2003 1:38 am

LadyIvanna wrote:
junkie christ wrote: find some men with less baggage that dont like abuse.

But I WANT one that likes abuse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

theres plenty of US. you just look in the wrong places...... :twisted:

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Sat May 10, 2003 1:41 am

Buttercup wrote:
Pharinet wrote:BUT! why is it that when I leave you alone Mr Nemesis that you talk about butt sex?
What is this phenomonon that causes men, when left alone to talk amongst themselves that the converstion reverts to anal sex?

I think it is my influence....

Oh yeah...get ready for knoxanal.cyb3rpunk.net....

muhahahaha!

god i love bubbble bursting.
nope not your influence, or ANY womens.. man its great when a women thinks they cracked the male mind. naaaaaa. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
but i still will offer seed money to a knoxanal site......

Nemesis · Post by **Nemesis** » Sat May 10, 2003 1:56 am

Pharinet wrote:Yes, most of us agree that Anal Sex is fun and I can even see the quantum energy aspect (especially if it's done right )

BUT! why is it that when I leave you alone Mr Nemesis that you talk about butt sex?
What is this phenomonon that causes men, when left alone to talk amongst themselves that the converstion reverts to anal sex?

Ok.. part 1 I could not agree with you more without causing myself pain... lol and to summarize part 2 I haven't the foggiest idea... :lol:

Nemesis · Post by **Nemesis** » Sat May 10, 2003 2:00 am

Buttercup wrote:I think it is my influence....

Ummmm... No...

Hardcoregirl · Post by **Hardcoregirl** » Sat May 10, 2003 7:11 am

Nemesis wrote:
Buttercup wrote:I think it is my influence....

Ummmm... No...

I was JOKING...

:roll:

Nemesis · Post by **Nemesis** » Sat May 10, 2003 7:31 am

Buttercup wrote:I was JOKING...

Ok...

iblis · Post by **iblis** » Sat May 10, 2003 8:45 am

Why is it that I still eat Krystals even though they are nasty?

ew! ew! ew! nasty!

doh, now i want some krystals. ):

junkie christ · Post by **junkie christ** » Sat May 10, 2003 11:36 am

Imp wrote:In societies with titles, the name is often placed in front of the title, separated by "the," such as "so and so, the Duke of York." This would lead you to assume that "Winnie the Pooh" is a name, Winnie, and a title, Pooh.

What kind of title is Pooh?

there is a book that listed as fiction/humor with tons of random opinions on what pooh symbolizes and what the word means...

Postmodern Pooh by Frederick Crews
North Point Press - October 2001
ISBN: 0-86547-626-8 - Hardcover

want my opinion? the author made up a word symbolic of poohs overweightness and pursuit of forbidden food
OR
all the 1000 acre wood characters are different parts of the psyche and pooh is the fragile glue that holds it together....... pooh is the title the author associated to this main persona......
OR
its close to poop.